One of the most common questions foreign investors ask when considering expansion into Indonesia sounds deceptively simple: can my company own land here?
The answer is not a straightforward yes or no.
A PT PMA — an Indonesian limited liability company with foreign capital — operates within a land law system that draws a clear and deliberate distinction between rights available to Indonesian citizens and certain designated legal entities, and those available to other legal entities. Understanding this distinction is not merely a legal compliance exercise. It is a strategic decision that determines investment structure, operational tenure, and the company’s overall asset position.
The Legal Framework: Where Do These Limits Come From?
Indonesia’s land law system is anchored in Law Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles (“UUPA”) — a regulation now over six decades old, yet still the primary foundation of the entire land rights regime in Indonesia today.
The UUPA organises land rights into several categories with a clear hierarchy. At the apex sits Hak Milik (Freehold Title) — the most permanent, strongest, and fullest right a person can hold over land, inheritable and transferable to other parties (Article 20 UUPA).
However, Article 21 UUPA establishes an explicit restriction: Hak Milik may only be obtained by Indonesian Citizens and legal entities specifically designated by the government. Under Government Regulation Number 38 of 1963 (“PP 38/63”), the designated legal entities are limited to:
- State-established banks
- Agricultural cooperative associations
- Religious bodies designated by the Minister of Agriculture/Agraria
- Social bodies designated by the Minister of Agriculture/Agraria
A PT PMA falls outside every one of these categories.
Why a PT PMA Cannot Hold Hak Milik
Law Number 6 of 2023 on Job Creation (Article 109(1)) defines a Perseroan Terbatas (PT) as a legal entity constituting a capital association, established by agreement, conducting business activities with authorised capital fully divided into shares.
This legal construction places a PT — including a PT PMA — outside the exclusive category of legal entities entitled to Hak Milik under PP 38/63. The barrier is not the foreign character of the company. It is the fundamental nature of a PT as a capital association that does not appear on the exhaustive list under PP 38/63.
The practical implication is unambiguous: no ownership structure can be used by a PT PMA to obtain Hak Milik over land in Indonesia — including nominee arrangements, which are not only legally ineffective but explicitly prohibited under Indonesian law.
Four Land Right Instruments Available to PT PMA
While Hak Milik is closed to PT PMA, the state provides four land right instruments that a PT PMA can lawfully obtain, each suited to different business needs and investment profiles.
1. Hak Guna Usaha — Business Use Rights (HGU)
HGU is the right to cultivate land directly controlled by the state. This instrument is specifically designed for large-scale business activities in agriculture, plantations, livestock, and fisheries.
Under Articles 28 and 29 of the UUPA, HGU is granted under the following conditions:
- Maximum initial term of 25 years, extendable by a further 25 years; for certain types of business, the initial term may reach 35 years
- Minimum land area of 5 hectares; for areas exceeding 25 hectares, the rights holder must apply appropriate capital investment and modern business technology
2. Hak Guna Bangunan — Building Use Rights (HGB)
HGB is the right to construct and own buildings on land that does not belong to the rights holder. It is the most widely used instrument by PT PMA in day-to-day operations — covering the construction of offices, factories, warehouses, and commercial facilities.
- Maximum initial term of 30 years
- Extendable by a further 20 years upon the rights holder’s request, subject to the condition and purpose of the building
3. Hak Pakai — Right of Use
Hak Pakai grants the holder authority to use and/or collect proceeds from land directly controlled by the state or owned by another party. It is granted either through a decision of the competent authority or through a lease or land cultivation agreement.
4. Right of Lease for Buildings
The Right of Lease allows a PT PMA to use land owned by another party for the purpose of constructing buildings, in exchange for rental payments to the landowner. Unlike the three preceding instruments, the Right of Lease is contractual in nature — an arrangement between two private parties.
Strategic Decisions That Must Be Made From the Start
The selection of a land right instrument is not an administrative formality — it is a business decision with long-term consequences. Several critical considerations must be evaluated from the outset:
Operational horizon. HGB with a 30-year term and a 20-year extension provides a maximum total of 50 years — sufficient for most investment cycles. For infrastructure projects with longer horizons, renewal planning must be embedded in transaction documents from signing.
Nature of business activity. HGU is specifically designed for large-scale land-based operations. Using an instrument that does not correspond to the company’s actual business activities can generate licensing complications.
Nominee risk. Nominee arrangements are not only legally precarious but create serious risks of ownership disputes and full transaction annulment.
Alignment with PT PMA structure. The land right instrument selected must be consistent with the company’s KBLI classification, business licence, and investment commitments recorded in LKPM filings.
Conclusion
A PT PMA cannot acquire land through Hak Milik — this is an absolute constraint within Indonesia’s land law system. But this limitation does not mean a PT PMA cannot secure adequate access to and control over land for its business operations.
The state provides four lawful instruments: HGU for large-scale land-based enterprise, HGB for building construction and ownership, Hak Pakai for use of state or third-party land, and the Right of Lease for contractual arrangements between private parties.
The key to success lies not in which instrument is chosen, but in ensuring that the instrument aligns with the business structure, investment horizon, and operational character of the PT PMA in question — an analysis best conducted with qualified legal counsel at the planning stage, before complications arise.
Legal References:
Law Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA)
Government Regulation Number 38 of 1963 (PP 38/63)
Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies
Law Number 6 of 2023 on Job Creation
Prasetyo Law Office is a Jakarta-based law firm providing integrated legal services across a wide range of practice areas, from commercial transactions to cross-sector litigation. With years of experience, we combine deep regulatory expertise with a thorough understanding of industry dynamics and our clients’ business character. We deliver comprehensive legal counsel and strategic solutions to help clients minimise legal risk across every business challenge they face.
For further information on this matter, please contact us:
Prasetyo Law Office
Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower 1 Level 3 Suite 304, Sudirman Central Business District (SCBD), Jl. Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 52–53, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 12190
Phone: +6221 5890 5002 (ext. 105)
Email: info@prasetyolawoffice.com
Disclaimer: This article has been prepared by Prasetyo Law Office for educational and marketing purposes only. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute formal legal advice. Accordingly, Prasetyo Law Office accepts no responsibility for any action taken by any party in reliance on this article beyond the purposes stated above.
